In July 2004, the magistrate wrote to Mrs. H., her husband, she should issue an administrative authority for the past and future, but what she has done before. This is even more astounding than the Judges in the courtroom said the policeman, he could not work but as property manager, which of course he did not write to the log. As the proprietors of the police officer was writing the information that he worked for many years as a property manager and manage different objects, this raises the question of when this officer's police service performed? Moreover, according to the law the transfer is not an office manager to another person allowed. That would be about the same as if a doctor gave a friend his doctorate. Even a police officer is forbidden to conduct of a trade, as I told a press representative of the police. In the courtroom at any rate, the police officers behaved as if he were at home. He went silent in the room while away around, the judge pointed to request documents, spoke not a word, just nodded her agreement or disagreement. I just read in my papers when the judge suddenly I yelled even louder than usual, "What you have just written on the note Enter now her!" The policeman took me away the paper and gave it to the magistrate. This raged: "You have in the Protocol of 2000, which will put Mr. H. to your table, the word" boiler "purely written!" Then he studied my entry and shouted: "The installation of a boiler has never been adopted." The judge had fallen into the trap! The policeman had in fact no decision and legitimacy can install an expensive boiler. This has been noted in the record, as punishment I received a reprimand from the judge, because I alleged minutes of the police would have disfigured. I am still convinced that I wrote on my trip log, because I have no memory of getting this hand of the policeman put on my seat to have. Later it was found that the pseudo-administrator had already without some decision Balkonboeden of owners to renew. However, it did at the court hearing, a letter from a supervisor before, which hosts a house owner can dispose of funds and over-in which it was alleged, the balconies were danger of a collapse! This supervisor-a lawyer-backed studied the record, where I insulted and slandered was at a great Bavarian town, where she is employed.
The judge appointed an expensive consultants, which should confirm the danger of collapse, which was not the course. In a letter to the court affirmed the policeman, the balconies would have to be removed, which means demolition and removal! In a subsequent district court proceedings was the police officer to boldly that he had been with the expert on my balcony! To this end he had no permission, nor the keys from me! But my husband met him one day in a Schluesselgeschaeft with a big list. I was able to establish a connection after it has been repeatedly broken into our apartment!
Since the attractive villa in the the apartment is located, monument and renovated in 1984, this assertion of the urgent removal of the balconies was clearly quite the air. When did manage police monument Villas and play as a witness on with the approval and support of a Bavarian court official! Even had the police officer complained in a letter to the court, I was a condemned person for the Eigentuemergemeinschaft intolerable and wanted to guide my way to this expropriation in the paths. He had already asked us to leave the apartment, the house and the country. This is not funny when you have a policeman at night crawling through the villa looks. The man has but one weapon! His colleagues on the ground tried uns durch mehrmaliges Sturmklingeln an unserer Wohnungstuere einzuschuechtern. Der Richter fand auch die Beleidigungen, Verleumdungen und Schmaehungen meiner Person, die dieser Mann schriftlich in Form von Protokollen und eigenen Schreiben dem Gericht vorgelegt hatte, nicht haltbar und erwaehnenswert. Wenn ich an das Gerichtsverfahren mit dem Fusssballer Effenberg denke, der angeblich einen Polizisten beleidigt haben soll, was er bestreitet, so ist doch deutlich ein Unterschied zu erkennen. Wird ein Polizist beleidigt, ist das ein Staatsskandal, wird eine Frau mehrfach beleidigt , verleumdet, diskriminiert und Opfer einer Rufmordkampagne durch einen Polizisten, dann interessiert das nicht einmal ein Gericht. Wo bleibt da die Gleichberechtigung und das in der Verfassung guaranteed right to dignity of the person? Is how the police officer added me as a crazy place that supposedly leads into Eigentuemerversammlungen Selbstgespraeche, insolent demands for access to bank records and invoices. be insubordinate behaves, it being noted is that I was in a meeting several times threatened by the police and shouted at. This, even though I've brought for my protection a lawyer. The good lawyer, however, committed suicide following this Eigentuemerversammlung clients betrayal. He stood on the side of the police, I wrote two outrageous letters in which he asked me what I would have against the police.
landed Merkwuerdigerweise these two letters from the police, which passes it to his friend the Judge sent. My second lawyer accused the first law on suspicion of treason clients. This spoke out as he testified, was in his office was broken into twice. Whether the letters were stolen, he could not prove, of course. Also wanted the "Mandantenverraeter" accept no more contrary to our agreements, the obtained Kostenvoranschlaege for the roof renovation. These were far too cheap. A roof replacement would cost at least three times! In the meeting namely an architect had been released, had been invited by the police, which was of course illegal, but except me seemed to bother anybody. The architect was presented by the pseudo manager as a professor of the University of Salzburg, as a result of my research turned out to be false. This architect claimed that he had observed in 1984 the renovation of the villa, they were poorly and inappropriately been executed by the craftsmen, and so should the house be renovated completely. Cables, pipes, windows, balconies, walls, etc. - only the urgent already decided in 2000 roof replacement was not a priority and necessary in a few years! He will make the planning and persoelich is of course due to this illustrious title of professor is very expensive. When he named his high hourly rate, even shouting at his supporters. It takes about six to eight weeks for the Architekturarbeiten.Das house he had not previously visited.
Eigentuemerversammlung This was illegal as anything else that the police officer drove a pseudo steward Sun The University of Salzburg did not know that Architects at all! Nevertheless, this man threatened me about his lawyer with an injunction. It read:.
"I, Mrs. C. I hereby expressly undertake ... and will continue to refrain from the assertion, Professor W. had no leadership ... to the title of professor authorized to the extent he was a fraud For the case of infringement, I undertake to pay compared to Prof. W. a penalty in the amount of 3,000.00 €. "- So you can earn very good money if you have several informers at hand. I handed my this Drohschreiben second lawyer, who wrote a strongly worded letter to the attorney for the "professor of the University of Salzburg. I also reported to display these architects to the prosecutor that worked the case around a half years not only when I gave up a second display and witnesses named, I was summoned as a witness to the police. The process then went to the General Prosecutor, and although the officer himself in the criminal investigation department admitted that he as the architect Professor at the University of Salzburg had imagined, and although I have an engineer named as witnesses, who confirmed my statements for the CID, was the procedure terminated. Citing the prosecutors Traunstein, I personally was not credible witness, because I for years with the policeman and his wife would have ACTION! The Austrian authorities informed me until years later that this title was not a legitimate state title and was not based on a law. A friend who knows the architect of his youth, laughed uproariously when I told him about the story called the University of Salzburg. The attorney for the young "professor" had fallen on the police officers because of his profession, he was got rid of him as caretaker of his apartment quickly. The policeman had been driven out in disgrace as a manager, because the common fund had alleged irregularities, he told me. In order to avoid a repeated eviction, refused the policeman from the beginning, the payroll records and invoices and bank statements of our new development officer. Even today, after five years, despite the decision of the Landgericht Traunstein, these 'accounts required are still not available! What bothers this policeman to the verdict of a District Court? What it takes care of a debt? Which lawyer will dare to take the enforcement against a police officer in Bavaria?
My lawyers claimed in court that the administrator would have to pay either 250 Mrs. H. € 000.00 or be sued by six months in jail would have to if the alleged professor of the University of Salzburg issued an order for the housing department.
0 comments:
Post a Comment